Asics Gel Stratus

I'm 15 and I run on the road and on treadmills mostly. from time to time its off-road but never to the point where I need crampons. I currently go's Nike Shox and they kill my feet. " I thought they were the best thing ever, but as I got older I realized they are not. There are two pairs that I watch: asics gel stratus 2.1% http://www.ladyfootlocker.com/catalog/productdetail/model_nbr--94749/sku--8990137/cm--GLOBAL% 3A% 20SEARCH% 20KEYWORD 20SEARCH /
and the new armor in the spectrum:
http://www.ladyfootlocker.com/catalog/productdetail/model_nbr--100295/sku--1536061/cm--GLOBAL 20SEARCH%%%% 3A 20KEYWORD 20SEARCH /
of course the weapons are more attractive virtue, but he says his heaviest if im thinking it might not be as comfortable and why they are so much money because they are under the armor has a strong trademark. which would be better .. ASICs or Under Armour?

I had the same problem using Nike. I went to a specialty running shoe store. In fact, they had a treadmill in the store and other technologies to analyze my foot and running style. They recommended Asics gel based on the fact that the shoe is made for runners with high arches on their feet while Nike had minimal arch support. They were great, no pain since. But I would recommend going to a specialty store. All tests are free and they will determine the type of foot and shoes that you have your running style and recommend the most suitable for you. You may pay a little more for shoes in the store, but you can always buy the same shoe with your future purchases also. If you already know you have high arches that Asics Gel is a perfect fit.

ASICS ® Women's Gel-Stratus 2.1

I do not even need to watch and I know that Asics are much better. I would never trust UnderArmour make good running shoes, then that is what Asics is all about.

Asics are much better, I acknowledge those who are actually blue and they are much better. underarmor is only good for clothes, no running shoes.

It depends on how much you ark and other things. Personally, I hate asics but some people love them. I do not know about shoes in armor, but I would never buy a pair of shows in armor. I would go to the store show running and trying on a shoe buch and see which ones you like, but beyond those two shoes I'd go with the ASIC.

Definitely go with the Asics, you should also check Brooks running shoes they are really good. Here is an excellent website, you should check Asics and Brooks on it (they are usually cheaper!): http://www.holabirdsports.com/m/Running/ ...

You should really go try them on first-hand.

The Under Armour running shoes online has been released at the end of January, so you will not find much, if any, people who are terribly familiar with them. You really can not buy running shoes just based on the brand, whatever. Your foot, arch, pronation, etc. are all different from those of others, and even individual brands and models vary considerably from one year to another.

For what its worth, the comments at the beginning of the Under Armour running shoes are in general showing (a) they tend to cushion the forefoot missing, but which are comfortable and (2) they are done from a latest unisex, so it is more important than usual for the women to try them on first-hand to make sure they match.

If they are absolutely your choice between two and you can not try and buy blindly, ASICs are probably a safer bet. Asics tend to run a bit closer, though, and are not for everyone, so it would be a really really really good idea to actually go to a race shop and try things on.